User:Loudcat44/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Jesus Estanislao

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I wanted to choose an article with a topic I do not know about and I have never heard of Jesus Estanislao. From first glance, it looks like a pretty trustworthy article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Leading section is good because it gives enough information about the topic of the article without any opinions. The content of the article is organized into two other sections besides the leading and references sections. They seem to be relatively equal, but I think the article needs more information on the topic in general. The author has a section outlining Estanislao's life near the leading section, but they do not have any media like images or videos. I am also weary of the sources for this article because the first one is pirated, the second one is a single page pdf with no author, publisher, or publish date, and the third one leads to a 404 error code. I also realized that a lot of the information in the article is paraphrased from the second source. All in all, I do not think this article is trustworthy.