User:Louycee/sandbox

Review By MSTGolf2021 (talk) 11:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The additions of the Missouri S&T Chem E Car team designs are good, I feel that it does give a good description of what the team tries to accomplish. I think that you could maybe add some information about the history of the design team, maybe dates created and then some accomplishments like competition results. I think that the most important thing to add to this section would be history and accomplishments for all of the teams. For example, If a possible student is looking at this page for school research decisions they might want some information regarding how well this team does / it could add incentive to joining a design team while at the school.

I agree that I should add history and accomplishments of the teams. Currently not all the teams are actually on the page and Chem E car was one that I added. I plan on adding more about the teams but I also know that Tyler has been working on them as well and I don't want to encroach on another team. I will reach out to him and see what different parts of that section we can work on.

This part is more for Dr. Sheppard but I would like to add more about the St. Pat's celebration but I'm not sure if it would be a conflict of interest since I'm on the board. I think it would be really good to put it under it's own title as St. Pat's or maybe keep it under traditions and include Greek Week as well. I think these are 2 pretty different things we do and would be good additions.

Does st. pats have its own page? I'd check that first. It might need to be its own page and linked to the S&T wikipedia page. K8shep (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Review An Article Questions

 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I do not see any bias
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Citations check out but there is too few of them
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Not a lot is referenced and more could be used
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? More on different formations can be added because right now a lot of the focus is on volcanoes
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There has been talks of merging pages with volcanoes but that was opposed because volcanoes is only one product of volcanism but there are many more
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is start class and it is part of WikiProjects volcanoes and geology

Chem E Car
The Missouri S&T Chem E Car team designs and constructs a small chemical reaction powered cars that are used in regional competitions. The designed car must be stopped by a timed chemical reactions and the goal of competitions is to see which car can be the most precise and stop at the given distance (15 - 30 m), solely using chemistry.