User:Lova Falk/My box

This and that shorties
• Emoticons lots of smileys!

• and even more smileys

• emotes and other stuff

• Invisible remarks:

• Categories on userpages:

• Requested moves: Requested moves

• Category watching

• material added in a way to make it look like existing sources support it

•

•

•

•

•

•

•  and  for a shorter time

•  for a longer time

•  user conflict of interest

• article from which content was removed

• •  bla

• • bla

• • bla

Small pics
•  Thank you! ~

• Face-smile.svg Face-smile.svg

• ♥ a heart to copy and paste

•

• Coin Icon.svg

•

• ✅ and ❌: ✅ and ❌

• :

For user talk pages

 * == Three revert rule == I would like to inform you about our three-revert rule. It says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. At this point, you have several times reverted xxx  and ignored our invitation to discuss on the Talk:Dxxx page.. Reverting once more will lead to a report to administrators. Please, come and discuss on the talk page instead!
 * ==Sources== Please add sources when you add text, for instance in   . If you don't know how, take a look at WP:referencing for beginners. Thank you! ~
 * == Sources == Hi  . Thank you for your contributions to    ! However, I noticed that you didn't provide a reliable source. It would be great if you could add a citation! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
 * Hi, and thank you for your edit of    ! It's a good thing that you stated your sources. However, they were incomplete. For instance, you wrote " xxx , 1983". Is this a book, an article? What is the title, name of journal, page numbers? I also wonder if you really read "xxx, 1983" or if you found this in another source, maybe a book? In that case, could you provide the information about the source that you actually used?

I know it is not so easy to start editing Wikipedia. You could read WP:referencing for beginners to add sources to articles. Welcome once more, and happy editing!
 * Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia! I just reverted the edit you made to  , because it didn't represent established knowledge. I don't know if you heard about WP:BRD – Bold Revert Discuss? It is a method for reaching consensus. It starts with one editor being bold and making an edit. What happens next is that another editor reverts this edit. Then, in order to prevent an edit war, if you really want the edit to be there, you should discuss this on the talk page and reach consensus. So your next step would now be discussing your edit on Talk:Fertility and intelligence. With friendly regards, ~

For article talk pages

 * I didn't check all of your sources, but those I checked were all WP:primary sources, that is, results of single studies. However, Wikipedia is not an academic paper or essay! Wikipedia articles  should be based on reliable, published secondary sources  (for instance, journal reviews and professional or advanced academic textbooks) and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources (such as undergraduate textbooks). WP:MEDRS describes how to identify reliable sources for medical information, which is a good guideline for many psychology articles as well. So please, reconsider your choice of sources and use secondary sources instead! With friendly regards, ~
 * Welcome! Please remember that Wikipedia is not an academic paper or essay! Wikipedia articles should not be based on WP:primary sources, but on reliable, published secondary sources (for instance, journal reviews and professional or advanced academic textbooks) and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources (such as undergraduate textbooks). WP:MEDRS describes how to identify reliable sources for medical information, which is a good guideline for many psychology articles as well. With friendly regards, ~
 * All sources you mention are WP:primary sources, that is, results of single studies. However, Wikipedia is not an academic paper or essay! Wikipedia articles  should be based on reliable, published secondary sources  (for instance, journal reviews and professional or advanced academic textbooks) and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources (such as undergraduate textbooks). WP:MEDRS describes how to identify reliable sources for medical information, which is a good guideline for many psychology articles as well. So please, reconsider your choice of sources and use secondary sources instead! With friendly regards, ~
 * :Hi xxx! If you have good, secondary sources – and please also check WP:MEDRS – then please be bold and write a section about it! With friendly regards, ~
 * This section has grown out of control, so I have moved it out of the article into this talk page. Please see Further reading and put only entries that are topical, reliable and balanced, and please, keep the section limited in size. "Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all existing works." Please, if you add an entry back into the article, motivate why. Thank you!
 * The External links section has grown out of control, so I have moved it out of the article into this talk page. Please see External links and put only links back in that are in accordance with WP:ELYES or WP:ELNO, and please motivate why the link should be there. Thank you!
 * :Quite right! However, the Talk page is for discussing the article. In what way would you like to change the article? ~
 * :Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Please, find some good and reliable sources, be bold and add to the article! ~

For articles

 * … is not recognized as a mental disorder in any of the medical manuals, such as the ICD-10 or the DSM-5;
 * was made by:
 * Multiple issues
 * or:
 * This is easy to understand, was made by:
 * was made by:
 * was made by:
 * was made by
 * For other uses, see Speech (disambiguation). was made by
 * generates: medical citation needed
 * generates: unreliable medical source?
 * generates: non-primary source needed
 * Opening history: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foobar&action=history replace foobar with article name

Read
WP:G = Wikipedia glossary

WP:3RR = Do not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period.

Tasks

 * merge Motor imagery with Mental practice of action
 * watch Cat:Psychology
 * make stubs into articles: neuroscience, psychology, and neuroanatomy
 * learn from Extinction (neurology)
 * test db-move

Signatures
Lova    Falk

Lova Falk    talk

Not vandalism, and vandalism

 * reversed good faith edit – newcomer:

Welcome to Wikipedia! I just reverted the edit you made to …, because it did not appear to be constructive. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia, and use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Thank you! ~


 * reversed good faith edit – not newcomer:

Hi! I just reverted the edit you made to …, because it did not appear to be constructive. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Thank you! ~
 * reversed edit but I might be wrong – newcomer:

Welcome to Wikipedia! I just reverted the edit you made to …, because it did not appear to be constructive. If you feel I'm wrong in reverting your edit, please feel free to put it back in. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia, and use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Thank you! ~


 * reversed edit but I might be wrong – not newcomer:

Hi! I just reverted the edit you made to …, because it did not appear to be constructive. If you feel I'm wrong in reverting your edit, please feel free to put it back in. Thank you! ~


 * not sourced (also newcomer expressing an opinion: ~

Note to self

 * Autism and working memory: see 2011 Autism and pervasive… (book) page 105 & The Profile of Memory Function in Children With Autism (article) page 3