User:LoveTheExperience/Habitat destruction/TOTM123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LoveTheExperience


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Habitat Destruction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Habitat destruction

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead section is well-written and concise, the original lead is brief, but clear as stated by the student. The lead section has been minutely updated to clarify some claims and adds a new citation. The lead section has been updated with new content from this draft; For example, adding on a point about 'Habitat being the number one cause of biodiversity loss' helps to add to the lead without elongating it too much.

Content

Content added is insightful, up-to date, and adds visual improvement to the articles info density. For example, adding a additional bit on 'restoration ecology' as a plausible solution when discussing fragmentation issues. This addresses equity gaps present in the article, such as providing additional and suggestions in regard to solution's and strategies to slow the damage caused by habitat destruction. Another topic that could be explored, is specific examples of notable global habitat destruction.

Tone and Balance

The added content was neutral. It made no attempt to sway my opinions or views on the topics presented. All the information appears to represent statements pulled from valid peer-reviewed, reputable sources.

Sources and References

All added content was properly sourced and cited from neutral, independent secondary sources. The links are current and properly organized, in addition to working properly.

Organization

The content is well-written, easy to comprehend, and structured to percent information from multiple sources. The content seems to be free of grammar and spelling issues. Lastly, the content is organized in a methodical and logical way, making good use of subheadings.

Images and Media

In the draft no images were included, but this is reasonable due to the extremist approach of Wikipedia when it comes to image-use.

Talk Page Discussion

The talk page lacks current discussion, however that's understandable as only a portion of the article is in the sandbox.

Overall Impressions

To end, this article has seen substantial improvements in the quality department, compared to how it was before. I particularly like the addition of the section on probable solutions to the problem! To further improve this article, more content could be added and layout reformatted in the original article.