User:LowIQPotato/Biometric data (athletes)/99rebound Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LowIQPotato


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:LowIQPotato/Biometric data (athletes)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Biometric data (athletes)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
N/A

Content
N/A

Tone and Balance
N/A

Sources and References
N/A

Organization
The sketch of the layout seems to be organized and has potential for a great flow for the article.

Images and media
.N/A

Overall Impression
Though there was limited content to review, the layout provided for the article seems to be a great fit.

Peer Review 2
Hey - this seems really interesting so far. Because of what you have described in the header, it seems like you should write your intro blurb in the context of data if there is another biometrics page. I also wonder if you could put the surveillance section into the privacy concerns section? I'm less familiar than you, but i feel like surveillance would be included in privacy concerns. Also it would be helpful to match articles from your annotated bibliography to sections of your article. The lead section should include some citations. I look forward to reading future iterations of your article.