User:Lpatterson15/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
13 Kensington Palace Gardens

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am interested in architecture. My first impression of it was that it seemed like a good and solid article.

Evaluate the article
The lead section was concise and did not include any information that was not mentioned in the article. A "Contents" section shows what the different sections of the article are. The content is relevant, up-to date, and did not deal with equity gaps. The article is neutral and does not support any one viewpoint on the topic. The references used in the article all have links that work, are very thorough, and are reliable. All info in the article can be backed up by these references. The article is well written, with no grammatical or spelling errors and is well organized. It includes well captioned visuals that adhere to copyright restrictions, and are laid out nicely. The "Talk" page does not appear to have any conversations about the topic in it. The article is rated as C-class and low importance to several projects including WikiProject Architecture, WikiProject London, and WikiProject Russia/politics and law. This article overall is a good read with little to no faults. My only note about improvement would be to shorten the "Critical Appraisal" section. It is longer than it needs to be and is not terribly relevant to the topic itself, more just dialogue and quotes about complaints about construction/style of the building. The article is well-developed and does not seem to need anything else.