User:Lplotnik/sandbox

The majority of the facts presented in the article do not have any reference. A third of the references are over half a century old, cite inappropriate sources (phys.org, newswise.com, esciencenews, etc.), or contain broken links altogether. One section dedicated to boron (over represented) contains effectively zero references.

A substantial portion of the article is convoluted and disjointed. At the very beginning of the article the writer’s mention of Liebig’s law is mostly irrelevant and easily confusing. The Nutrient Deficiency section is depressingly empty, however the section  “processes” expands into plant anatomy.Compared to how we talk about plant nutrition in class, I’d say this article is limited. In class we are able to draw connections between nutrients and WHY they matter to plants.