User:Lrz22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Electric fireplace

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because there are some citation errors that need to be fixed, as well as being a relatively short article. By providing more sections to the article, it will give the reader a better understanding of the topics. My first impression of the article was that it covered the history well, but not the actual mechanisms and technology aspect of the electric fireplace.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section gives the impression that the article will later go into detail about the technical aspects of the electric fireplace, however it does not. This could be improved by adding a new section to the article. However, it gives a good overview of what the technology is.

Dimplex is mentioned often throughout the history section of the article. This company may be overrepresented in this article. The article may benefit from having a section simply dedicated to Dimplex or to companies that produce electric fireplaces. The Talk section of the article did mention this flaw, stating that it reads like an advertisement.

The article has sources that work, but is missing citations according to the alert at the beginning of the article.

This article is very easy to read and is organized well. However, there are a few grammatical errors, such as a semi-colon where there doesn't need to be a semi-colon. The images shown throughout the article are high quality and aide the readers' understanding of the technology.

Overall, the article can be improved by adding sources and adding more information about the technical aspects of the electric fireplace.