User:Lsm1041/Veterinary pathology/Aiden Brown Peer Review

General info
Lsm1041
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lsm1041/Veterinary pathology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Veterinary pathology

Evaluate the drafted changes
- I think you've done a great job so far! Your additions have significantly improved the quality of the article.

- I was a little confused at first, because I didn't realize you'd already added these changes to the article until looking in the edit history. Maybe you could make note of this on the main page?

- The lead seems good! Its strengths include that the introductory sentence is concise and clear, and it briefly discusses the sections of the article. It could maybe be improved in my opinion by adding a sentence or two with a brief definition of each of the two kinds of veterinary pathology.

- It looks like your citations are a good start! All information added seems to be cited and sources seem reliable. However, it seems there's an issue with the link for source 2, and source 6 and 7 are the same source cited twice. They could also perhaps benefit from more sources from peer-reviewed journals, as I typically see a lot of those cited in scientific articles, but only if applicable - I'm not sure how available those are for this topic.

- I think the addition of some WikiLinks could be an easy way to improve the article, linking to other Wikipedia pages on some of the topics mentioned. For instance, you could link to pages for each of these kinds of tests in the "hematology, hemostasis, urinalysis, cytology, and clinical biochemistry tests" part.

- Content added seems well-written, easy to understand, and has very good grammar/spelling. The information is relevant and adds to the topics being discussed. Overall I'd say continuing to elaborate and explain more on the topic to help flesh out the existing article, like you have been doing, has been working well, and I'd encourage you to continue doing the same.

- Minor note, but I think that in this sentence, "Ultimately, veterinary pathology consists of most of the behind-the-scenes laboratory work that studies virus, infections, bacteria, and much more," the grammar seems a little off. Maybe it'd make more sense for "virus" to be plural, as "viruses," like how the other things listed as studied in the laboratory work are plural.

- Content added is neutral, balanced, and not biased. Doesn't appear to tackle any equity gaps, but that seems to not be very relevant to the article's topic, so this is not a big issue.

- Keep up the good work! :)