User:Lsm1041/Veterinary pathology/Kaitlin3farrell Peer Review

General info
Lsm1041
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lsm1041/Veterinary pathology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Veterinary pathology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Before doing any evaluations I want to address that I am a little uncertain as to what information was made by the original user in comparison to the contributions you have added. I am going to go off the actual article, since there are only a few sentences in the sandbox.

Lead: The leading sentence introduces what a veterinary pathologist is and leads into the two types of pathologists who are later explained in the article. I really liked this and have zero complaints!

Content: In terms of content, all of the information is relevant to the topic. You make sure to include information that further explains the two types of veterinary pathology. One thing I want to mention is perhaps you could create different sub-areas where you describe how people become veterinary pathologists, some examples of diseases or equipment that they are comfortable in, well known contributions from veterinary pathologists, salary information of veterinary pathologists, etc. I feel that these are all important components of pathology, but it is up to you to add them! I am pursuing pathology which is why I thought I would mention it.

Tone and Balance: In terms of tone, you do a wonderful job making certain to stay informative and limit bias. I feel that the content tries to inform not persuade which is incredibly important for the Wikipedia article. Great job!

References: In terms of references, you have done a great job making certain that these are good sources. I feel that they are very reliable and the information being discussed in the article matches what the source says. You make sure to incorporate these sources into your article. Great job!

Media: In terms of Media, there are a couple images that relate to veterinary pathology. Personally, I would love some images that show each of the different diseases that the pathologist may see, like behind the microscope, but that's really it.

Overall Impressions: Overall, you do a great job! I really enjoyed reading this article. You did a great job attaining sources that matched what you were saying, you had really good grammar, and made certain to minimize all bias. In terms of content, I feel that there are areas where you could definitely expand to help minimize the questions of viewers but other than that, this was really good! Keep up the great work :)