User:Ltorack/sandbox

Article Evaluation

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The article stays on topic
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * There is little evidence of any biases within this article
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There was little information related to John Dumbleton's work as an Oxford calculator in comparison to the other "key calculators"
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links for citations available on the internet worked.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Most of the information regarding specifics on the "key calculators" was drawn from one source.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is a part of many WikiProjects and rated as a start class.