User:LuciaRWest/Prenatal testing/Rafpez Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the changes made to this article have benefited the credibility of the article. The main changes that I saw were regarding the qualifying risk factors and the chromosomal abnormalities sections. In the qualifying risk factors: I appreciated the list that includes the risk factors of why a person should get screened. I think that the layout helps the reader navigate this section. I would suggest trying to find the missing source in this sections and possibly stating that amniocentesis and CVS are the procedures that lead to the test and not the testing themselves.

As for the chromosomal abnormalities, I really appreciated the use of gender inclusive language (i.e. using parental instead of maternal). I think that this helps this article in being inclusive especially in such a difficult field. The biggest next steps tI would recommend on this topic would be to possibly add a bit more detail on other technique. I feel like this section is fairly vague and this can confuse the reader. Leading them to ask more question than are answered.

Overall I think that the changes made have really impacted this article and have made it a more reliable source of information to the general public.