User:Luckyclover44/Spy pixel/Penguinblueberry Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Luckyclover44


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Luckyclover44/Spy pixel
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Spy pixel

Lead
Guiding questions:

The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. The lead is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content added is relevant to the  topic. There is no information  included that is irrelevant. + Content  is neutral. I'm not sure if there  are criticisms  of enforcing laws on spypixels. if   there   are that  would be  interesting to touch on.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic
 * I might move the legislation section above the external individual regulations section. If not protected by external legislation, individuals can do x?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:

The article is significantly more complete  now. The parts added to  the article  are more utilitarian -- allowing  people  to understand and  potentially notice  spy  pixels before they impact  them. It's far more information than it was before. I also thought it was really impressive how you described the technology in such simple terms, it made it a lot easier to follow. I wonder if there is any information about how successful the privacy regulations have been  at reducing  spy pixels. That could be interesting.

Evaluate the Drafted Changes 2
Hey! Your mainspace article looks awesome.

Lead

Guiding questions:

The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. The lead is concise. However, I think it might be helpful to add one of the sentences about what percentage of emails have spy pixls i in them or just one of the statistics  from your spying effect section.

Content

Guiding questions:

I also thought it was really impressive how you described the technology in such simple terms, it made it a lot easier to follow!
 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content added is relevant to the  topic. There is no information  included that is irrelevant. + Content  is neutral. If there is information  available that criticizes the use  of  spypixels  I think  that might be interesting  to  add.