User:Lucyc2/School Psychology/Treyj96 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lucyc2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lucyc2/School Psychology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * School psychology

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the article has a fairly strong lead so it may be a good move to leave it as is.

One of the first things I noticed when reading the article was the lack of citations in the in the assessment process subsection, so I am glad to see that you are making some additions regarding the type of assessments that are given, but the article may also benefit from the addition of some reliable sources that address problems with assessments in general under the issues related to school psychology section.

Regarding your changes to the interventions section, I agree with your decision to at least rework that section as it reads awkwardly and may benefit from a refresh, and I like what you have added so far. However, I think that completely deleting and starting from scratch may be difficult to execute, as some of the bones of the section may still be adequate to build from, such as the section about PBIS.

I do like your changes in the prevention section as its expands upon a sparse section of the article.

I think that the sections about employment and education could use a little bit of an update, employment in particular seems to not have had statistics updated since the early 2010s

All in all, great work on the article and I look forward to seeing how you improve it further!