User:Luisa9544/Michael Spencer (engineer)/NickOden Peer Review

General info
Luisa9544, Sethm2036, Michael248
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Luisa9544/Michael Spencer (engineer)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:Luisa9544/Michael Spencer (engineer)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * The Lead feels perfect reading, It gives us a good information about Michael Spencer's past
 * The information was laid out super good when it came to talking about what Michael Spencer is doing and what he studies, letting us know what we will be reading about
 * I feel the lead is perfectly detailed and no information isn't spoke about throughout the article

Education

 * The education segment is filled with up to date information that shows us where Michael Spencer got most of his education. I think the only information that probably could've been added is younger education like elementary to high school.
 * All the sources listed for the education tab are inserted well and Wiki links are a great touch to the page giving it a more professional look to it.
 * All the sources are current and well informed and all the links added are available to access

Work

 * The work segment of the article lays out a good timeline as to what Spencer has accomplished over the years of his education and working periods.
 * The information that has been gathered from the source they used in the bigger paragraph from the segment is up to date and well explained making no grammar mistakes that I can see, though I would suggest a different word than "Full professor" In one sentence.
 * The sub information used in the second paragraph are really good as well, I believe they could add a little more to the segment in due time and the page will look more full in that segment.
 * The source placements are well thought out and perfect in their placements
 * The Paragraphs don't show any signs of Bias from what I can tell, Just very resourceful for finding out information about Michael Spencer
 * The tone is very neutral and educational being easy to understand and straight to the point with information about his work and a little bit on his education. *I still feel like some of this information could have been used to expand his Education segment but none the less still a good segment.

Research

 * The first Paragraph tells us what Mr. Spencer is actually studying, I feel more information as to what the two subjects are could help in understanding more about his work. The battery inclusion was great as it was well written and explained giving us more of an idea as to what he does.
 * I feel a little more context in the history makers quote can help out in discussing his research in the first segment as well, it feels a little out of place at the moment. By context I mean a little more in the quote maybe some information before "those papers have" so we know what those papers mean

Social Responsibility

 * This segment of the article talks about Spencer's accomplishments over his years and does so using the History makers quote which was previously established as up to date and able to use. I don't have much to say in this segment as it was easy to read and very inspiring to note

Thoughts
This article was Very fun and informational to read. Through out its topics I read no bias and just a crew that wants to inform the world of Michael Spencer's work which I feel their doing exceptional at so far. I think for little improvements that can potentially be added are just context to the quotes that they use or just having a little more information on them before hand so they don't feel out of place. But besides that I think this Wikipedia is great for learning more about Mr. Spencer and his research specifically so far. You guys got this

-NickO.