User:LukeShort2/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: Socioeconomics
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The article has a good interdiction and gives us a definition of socioeconomics. The context goes over the basis of socioeconomic but could really go deeper into the ideas about it. Their tone and balance in the article is pretty neutral because I don't really think there can be a bias view when defining socioeconomics. The organization for the article is good. But there are no images in the article and the conclusion I s very small and could use some improvement. Overall the evidence is mostly back up by sources.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title: Social Economics
 * Article Evaluation:
 * The opening of the article gives a good definition of Social Economics . It goes into the common values that social economics follows. The content is interesting and there seems to be many things that are not needed as much. But the history part is completely empty and needs to be filled in. The sources are very limited according to wikipedia and they hope someone will improve them. There is no images on the article which should be improved. The talk page is interesting; I see a lot of people asking questions on what the article means by things and if things need to be corrected. Overall I think the article could use a decent amount of improvement.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title:Market Capitalzation
 * Article Evaluation
 * The opening gives a pretty good definition of Market Capitalization. It gives the readers what it is and how the public opinion effects market capitalization. The content of the article shallow and  could go much deeper into certain topics. The history is just a chart that is interesting but does not give us an idea of where market capitalization came from. The article does a good job sourcing the information in it. The article also does a good job with organization. There are no images in the article which can be improved. But my overall I think the article does a good job defining and sourcing the information that is talked about, but it could just be expanded on more.
 * Sources
 * The opening gives a pretty good definition of Market Capitalization. It gives the readers what it is and how the public opinion effects market capitalization. The content of the article shallow and  could go much deeper into certain topics. The history is just a chart that is interesting but does not give us an idea of where market capitalization came from. The article does a good job sourcing the information in it. The article also does a good job with organization. There are no images in the article which can be improved. But my overall I think the article does a good job defining and sourcing the information that is talked about, but it could just be expanded on more.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title:August 2011 the stock market falls
 * Article Evaluation
 * The introduction did a decent job introducing what happened and the causes of the crash. But in my opinion should go deeper into the reasons the stock market fell. The articles tone is not bias by showing us what happened in every country when the market fell. All the information and claims are back up by citations. There are no images in the article which can easily be improved. The organization of the article is good. It gives us a overview of what it is and what places in the world it effected; then goes into each country it effected and how it effected it. Overall the article is well written but could be improved in the introduction and the history.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title: Stock Market Prediction
 * Article Evaluation
 * The introduction gives the readers an understanding of what Stockmarket prediction is and how it is impossible to fully predict. Which I though seemed a little bias at first but then it goes into the idea that people disagree and they go about trying to predict the stock market changes. The content of the article is interesting and gives us and idea of why it is so hard to predict changes in the stock market. All the information in the article is back up by citations. The article is well organized but the writing quality is a little hard to read in my opinion. There are no images in the article. But overall I think the article gives a good understanding on how people try to predict the changes in the stock market and how hard it is to do so.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources