User:Luke Clements/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Lancia Delta S4

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I love rallies, and this is one of the most unique and exciting cars made in the rally years. Only 28 chassis were ever made, but it was one of the fastest cars in the series. It doesn't have as much information as well, making it easy to read and understand.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section


 * 1) Yes the article clearly does an introductory statement that is clear and descriptive.
 * 2) Yes
 * No
 * 1) It is concise as not overly puffy. It gives the information in a structured manor that does not overcomplicate things.

Content


 * 1) Yes
 * 2) Yes the topic is old but up to date.
 * 3) There is some content that is missing about the races that the vehicle was apart of and the time that they dominated with.
 * 4) No this article does not deal with a equity gap, and no it does not have underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balence


 * 1) Yes the article is neutral
 * No
 * No
 * No
 * 1) There is no persuasion only facts about the car.

Sources and references


 * 1) Yes the sources back up the article
 * 2) Yes
 * 3) Some are some are older due to the car being older as well.
 * 4) Yes there are a variety of sources.
 * 5) No I don't believe that there are better sources.
 * 6) As far as I have checked all the links work.

Writing Quality


 * 1) Yes It was a well written article
 * 2) Yes
 * 3) Yes

Images and Media


 * 1) yes
 * 2) yes
 * 3) Yes
 * 4) Yes they are all spaced out and look good.

Talk Page Discussion


 * 1) Some conversations are had about the speculation on how fast the cars 0-60 was and also what to do about the ending, but other than that there was not much.
 * 2) Sadly not its a very small article I think only true rally fans would appreciate
 * 3) I don't exactly understand the question but I can see in the talk page how people actually go about editing or making changes to articles which i found interesting.

Overall impressions


 * 1) I don't really know what the articles status is but its up to date however does need some additions.
 * 2) The article strengths are that it shows a brief history of the vehicle explains how it was made but most impotently it went over the coolest feature of the car which was the added turbo to the supercharging kit. It went into depth about the different functions of the vehicle and what made them important.
 * 3) We could definitely be improved is the articles lack of races that the vehicle was in. More information could be added as well as more pictures from the actual race itself which I believe exist somewhere.
 * 4) I am hesitant to say it is under developed although the article definitely needs more. It is a smaller topic so it does not need that much information however I feel as though some things could be added. It is close to being finished but I think some information about races and more about the actual engine itself would make this article complete.