User:Luliloisel/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Human information interaction

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose Human information interaction (HII) because I enjoy learning about new fields that have to do with social development. HII matters because it aids in providing access to information and develops the constantly evolving technology that helps distribute it. My first impression of the idea was that I was very interested to learn more, however the article is only one paragraph long and I did not learn much.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article did not have a strong lead section. The introductory sentence was concise and defined the term but I did not find that clearly describes the articles topic. The lead section does not include a description of what is written further in the article and the article is only one paragraph long. The lead is short and gives the reader information that is not elaborated on or necessary for the lead.

The articles content is relevant to the topic however I do think the topic could be elaborated on a bit more and the article can use some additional sections. There was an edit in 2021 and the sources are all from 2000-2005. The article is missing further elaboration on some of the ideas written in the lead. This article does not address topics related to underrepresented populations.

The article is written from a neutral point of view and does not offer any biased claims. Their were no over or under-represented view points in this article. There was no mention of minority viewpoints. I do not feel the author was trying to persuade.

I did not find the sources to be current but they were peer reviewed sources.

I had a bit of trouble following this short article. I do have ADD so I am not completely sure if it is my fault or if the article is not written well. Grammar looks good but I am questioning the organization.

The article does not include and images. There is not a talk page available for this article.

Overall I would say this article lacks information. I think there needs to be more research added to this article. The strengths lie in the grammar and concise language. I would love to read more on this topic.