User:Lululimonade/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Akira (1988 film)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I was interested in the topic of the article, as well as the content of the article.

Evaluate the article
The article has a strong lead section that provides an overview of the articles content. It's concise and addresses only the information that can be found through reading the article further. The content of the article is up-to-date, relevant to the topic, and has nothing missing. The article is presented from a neutral point of view, avoiding personal interpretations and biases. Because of this there is no swaying the reader to one side or the other. The sources are extensive, some out-of-date and some that are from the last year. All of the sources at face value seem reliable and the links work. There are only two images within this article, a theatrical poster and geography of the film's fictional world. The article is well organized and structured. It flows naturally and is easy to follow. It breaks down the content into major parts so the information is not too condensed. From my reading I could not identify any grammatical errors. The images are captioned well and are visually appealing, however the use of more images when discussing vital parts of the film could be more beneficial for readers to understand the context. The article is rated level-5 and within the talk page are concerns about information within the article in regards to users' personal interpretations about the film. The talk page is listed as C-rated. Overall, this is a strong article that meets all the requirements of a good article. It has relevant information that is conveyed from a neutral point of view, with no present biases. Additionally, it has a good flow and structure that makes it easy to read and understand. The only personal recommendation I have is more media and image usage could help when describing vital scenes from the film.