User:Lumiious/Architecture of Africa/Bhaley16 Peer Review

In the first part of the book, the author pushes the question of whether your parents truly love you. If people out there test our love of God, and people, and the world, is this a test by God? Why would anyone cultivate theories against love?

I would consider love to be a mix between a “thing” and an activity. I would rather say that love is an idea, a memory, or a force to a “thing.” My question is how do we accurately interpret that love that is either an activity, idea, memory, or force being God’s love and how can we analyze the difference between them and decide whether or not one is a heresy? Heresies like the arguments of the trinity.

Molly during the second question states that love is one of the biggest contributing factors to the fundamentals of Christianity as a whole. I agreed and added that the covenants given to Abraham, Israel, etc. and the sacrifice of His own son, are the backbone to choose God’s love and to love the world God has given us.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)