User:LundyLoo/Allostatic load/BrownBoy1999 Peer Review

General info
(LundyLoo)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:


 * So far, the content added is relevant to the topic of allostatic load. The three different categories you have are pretty clear about what you will talk about in them.
 * The content looks to be up-to-date. Your articles are all relatively recent and you back up your claims with those articles. Perhaps one separate category talking about the consequences of the culmination of allostatic load would wrap this up nicely. You briefly cover it in the causes of allostatic load.

Tone and Balance:


 * Most of the content added so far is neutral. I don’t perceive any bias one way or another in what you are talking about as it comes across broadly being about allostatic load . I do not know what the research says but is any degree of allostatic load a good thing? Perhaps that could help balance out this.

Sources and References:


 * Your sources and references appear to be appropiate. They are within the last few years and do not seem to all be from one anuthor. I would be interested if the allostatic load theory varies in race or ethnicity? I do not think this is needed but could be useful for the sake of diversification of research dissemination.

Organization:


 * I think the organization so far is great. I appreciate that it is broken into sections so I know what I am about to read. Perhaps “definition” could go firsr since it may be useful to have the definition before I read the rest of the article.
 * As I mentioned. I think a separate section for the consequences of the allostatic load may make more sense, so it is not with the “Causes...: section
 * For the “implications..” section, the content here feels rather broad to be talking about implications. A bit more elaboration on the cognitive and physical functioning could be useful to the reader.
 * Overall, I think the information added contributes a lot to the article! It is straight to the point.