User:LundyLoo/Allostatic load/Organizedchaos39 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content: You have provided a lot of valuable information for this article. The content you added was very informative and made the topic easier to understand. However, I would reccommend rewriting these sentences for clarity:

“Causing factors of allostatic load include the following: continual physiological arousal due to chronic stress, inadequate coping, continuing stress response following the completion of a stressor, and insufficient allostatic response to a stressor”

"Similarly, when the structural remodeling (e.g., cellular and molecular processes from the nucleus of a cell to the surface of a cell) of neural architecture, which is a key result of stress, continues past the termination of a stressor, the body is no longer maintaining a status of homeostasis and the extended stress has negative implications."

Tone: Your tone is very clear and formal. Your writing is clear and easy to understand.

Organization: Your organization is well formatted and makes sense.

Sources: All of your sources are relevant and all of the links are working.

Summary: Overall, these edits are very well done. You have explained allostatic load in a way that individuals who are not in our field can easily understand it.