User:Lupe12x/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Content


 * yes there is relevance to my topic. not much that had distracted me other than it is a pretty vague and open topic to search the only thing that i do that that is not relevant is the Australia portion. but i do understand why they put that in there as a gun free nation.
 * There is information that is up to date, i do believe that especially now it is something a lot of people discuss.
 * Smaller fields is what can be improved, but again it is such a vague topic there is other searches to narrow down what i would need to actually look for.

Tone


 * tone to me does seen a little neutral. i know there is a lot of controversy on gun violence that it could have easily swung one way or another.
 * i do think they are presented enough, i do not think there is too much or too little they do touch on a lot of different subject involving gun violence . and all sub topics that are involved as well.

Sources


 * There are a lot of citations on this page and it does support the claims in the article. They do work and it is constantly changing because it is a  people will always have something to improve on.
 * A lot of the sources look to come from Journals. There are some from Australia that is not all relevant to the US but to the topic as a whole on gun violence it does come in use. it could be a more bias because it is coming and comparing to a gun free nation.

There are wikiprojects on this topic, going into different parts of the topics as well. the topic wanted to be deleted as a whole there is just too much and too many people trying to put there input there are a lot of conversations of what should be removed and people trying to put in their bias on the talks. The wikiprojects looks at the firearms as a whole, sociology and politics. looking at more specifically gun politics. Also EMS, i think these projects are related to my topic and will come in use when trying to to look further in this topic