User:Lutgringa/sandbox

= Article Evaluation of Dating the Bible =


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Yes. No.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No. No.
 * What else could be improved?
 * Possibly put the books in order of when they were written instead of how it is written in the bible since it is about dating not content.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, it only talks about the dating of the writings.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Yes. Yes.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Yes.The information comes from books talking about the bible. They could be considered biased, because the are none that do not believe the bible is real and the Christianity is real. There is not an opposing viewpoint of atheism for example.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * The conversations revolve around the credibility of sources. The bible was written along time ago and to find the correct dates is nearly impossible. Everyone has there opinion on the matter, but in my opinion we will never truly know when every book was written.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * C-class. WikiProjects Bible.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We have not talked about this topic in class.