User:Luthyc/Single-molecule magnet/Gblair13 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Luthyc
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Luthyc/Single-molecule magnet

Lead
Guiding questions: No Lead Updates


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, maybe add some sources from the 2010s
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I do not believe so
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? The first paragraph has no citations, so you need to back that up with sources
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? I think you need to add a few more sources to make this a bit more thorough
 * Are the sources current? The sources are relatively current, but I would like to see some sources from advances in the last decade
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? I think they are fine
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? You should try to elaborate a little bit more on the technical terms in your paragraphs. All of your acronyms should be written out and explained. Make it so that people without much scientific background would be able to understand the core concepts of your writing
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I do not think so
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The one section that you have is nice and it looks as if it is important to the topic as a whole

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? I think that what you have added is a nice addition to the topic. Maybe start working on other areas that you can add to the topic
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It seems like you have a nice amount of information presented, just expand on the technical parts and add more sources
 * How can the content added be improved? As above, expand on technical terms and add more sources. Maybe from more modern publications