User:Luvgorloks/Edwin Sutherland/Everydayjello Peer Review

General info
Luvgorloks
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the topic of this article. The Lead is concise and not overly detailed. The content is related to the topic and the sources used for the updated content are up-to-date. The content seems to be factual with no viewpoints or words that should be meant to persuade the reader in favor of one position or another. Based on the extensive information given, it does not seem as if there is missing content and current information is backed up by reliable sources. The sources are recent and have different authors allowing for diversity in information.