User:Luvgorloks/Edwin Sutherland/Maddie2025 Peer Review

General info
Luvgorloks
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Luvgorloks/Edwin Sutherland
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
What is DAT? if it is differential association theory, perhaps write it as "... differential association theory, DAT, ..." when first referencing it.

So far the article looks good, very informative and the sources seem reliable and it uses a balanced tone throughout. If you can find anything, I think it would be interesting to have a little more about him as a person in addition to his contributions to criminology.

LEAD


 * the lead has not been updated to reflect new content.

CONTENT


 * the content added is relevant and up-to-date to the topic. the article body paragraph is provides great detail about what Edwin Sutherland has achieved in the field of criminology. I would not say there is anything missing or something that does not belong. I did suggest that if the editor wanted to add more, they could provide a section about him as a person outside of his criminology career.

TONE AND BALANCE


 * the content added seems fairly neutral and I personally do not think it sounds biased in any way. I think viewpoint of gang relations might be over represented in the paragraph provided, but does not persuade the reader in one way or another.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES


 * the sources cited in this article help and reflect the editors new content. two out of the three sources are from within the last fifteen years, so they are relatively current and still reliable given they are about a theory and a person's work. Based off of the google search of each of the authors cited, they are not very diverse. They seem to come from the same educational background (social sciences). The link provided do work.

ORGANIZATION

OVERALL IMPRESSIONS
 * I would say the content is easy to read and clear. the only suggestion I would have is maybe find a different word in place of "okay", but other than that I could not find any other grammatical or spelling errors.


 * I think the new content adds to the overall quality because it goes into more detail of his accomplishments in the world of criminology. One of the strengths is the sources cited. They are reliable and accurate, but I would make sure to be on the lookout for more.