User:Luvvkushwah/sandbox

= Kushwaha or Kachhwaha = Kushwaha (sometimes, Kushvaha) is a community of the Indian subcontinent, which has traditionally been involved in agriculture (including beekeeping).The term has been used to represent at least four subcastes, being those of the Kachhis, Kachwahas, Koeris and Muraos. They claim descent from the mythological Suryavansh (Solar) dynasty via Kusha, who was one of the twin sons of Rama and Sita. Previously, they had worshipped Shiva and Shakta.

Demographics
William Pinch notes their presence in Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Bihar.

Myths of origin
Today, the Kushwaha generally claim descent from Kusha, a son of the mythological Rama, himself an avatar of Vishnu. This enables their claim to be of the Suryavansh dynasty but it is a myth of origin developed in the twentieth century. Prior to that time, the various branches that form the Kushwaha community - the Kachhis, Kachwahas, Koeris, and Muraos - favoured a connection with Shiva and Shakta.Ganga Prasad Gupta claimed in the 1920s that Kushwaha families worshiped Hanuman - described by Pinch as "the embodiment of true devotion to Ram and Sita" - during Kartika, a month in the Hindu lunar calendar.

It is a big confusion among the common mass about the word “Kushwah”.

It is to inform you that there was a trend started by many Schedule community groups to steal the identity of prominent Rajputs Surnames of Country.

It is not only the word Kushwah but other surnames of Rajputs are also being stolen like “Rathod/Rathore, Chauhan, Baghel etc..” by these schedule groups and they are making their association with these copied surnames and shouting everywhere as a headless chicken to make them identified as a Rajput.

Kushwah ward is related with mighty Survanshi kings “Kachhwah / Kachhwaha”.

Descendants of lord Ram’s 2nd Son Kachhwahas are one of the prominent Rajput clan of India and in some parts they use to write their Surname as”Kushwah or Kachhwah” but during the end of 18th century when Indian social structure was getting influenced by many forces like Islamic scholars and Bloody Communists ”Vampanthis”, some of the schedule castes of India have started stealing the surnames of prominent Rajputs and Brahmins.

Many Kachi, Kories and Murai (who called themselves as Maurya) have started using the the surname Kushwah to get social recognition and writing it as “Kushwaha” but they were actually Kachis and Kories whose occupation was an agriculture. They have copied not only the term Kushwah but also started copying the Surname of other prominent Rajputs and Brahmins like Chauhan, Rathod, Baghel, sharma etc… Mostly it is getting done in Bihar, Uttar pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryaya etc.

Actually the word Kushwah belongs to Kachhwaha Rajputs only and these Kachi and Kori community people are copying it in many parts of the Country.

Some people get confused and think of the word Kushwah related to these Schedule castes but actually these people are not associated with Original

Kushwah Rajputs.

One thing we want to make clear that we will not allow them to create a misnomer history.

All these associations like AIKKM or Rathore Samaj etc. are belongs to Kachi, kories and telies who are not Rajputs and they are stealing these surnames for past few decades.

There corrupt actions will not be allowed further. They need to understand that prominent Rajputs have got recognition by working hard for society as a whole and for humanity.

This glory can not be copied by merely copying the name of prominent Rajputs like Rahod, Kushwah or chauhan. These people will have to work hard to gain glory rather than

stealing the name of Rajputs.

Shudra varna
The Kushwaha were traditionally a peasant community and considered to be of the stigmatised Shudra varna.Pinch describes them as "skilled agriculturalists". The traditional perception of Shudra status was increasingly challenged during the later decades of British Raj rule, although various castes had made claims of a higher status well before the British administration instituted its first census. Pinch describes that "The concern with personal dignity, community identity, and caste status reached a peak among Kurmi, Yadav, and Kushvaha peasants in the first four decades of the twentieth century."

Classification as Kushwaha Kshatriya
From around 1910, the Kachhis and the Koeris, both of whom for much of the preceding century had close links with the British as a consequence of their favoured role in the cultivation of the opium poppy, began to identify themselves as Kushwaha Kshatriya.An organisation claiming to represent those two groups and the Muraos petitioned for official recognition as being of the Kshatriya varna in 1928.

This action by the All India Kushwaha Kshatriya Mahasabha (AIKKM) reflected the general trend for social upliftment by communities that had traditionally been classified as being Shudra. The process, which M. N. Srinivas called sanskritisation, was a feature of late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century caste politics.

The position of the AIKKM was based on the concept of Vaishnavism, which promoted the worship and claims of descent from Rama or Krishna as a means to assume the trappings of Kshatriya symbolism and thus permit the wearing of the sacred thread even though the physical labour inherent in their cultivator occupations intrinsically defined them as Shudra. The movement caused them to abandon their claims to be descended from Shiva in favour of the alternate myth that claimed descent from Rama. In 1921, Ganga Prasad Gupta, a proponent of Kushwaha reform, had published a book offering a proof of the Kshatriya status of the Koeri, Kachhi, Murao and Kachwaha. His reconstructed history argued that the Kushwaha were Hindu descendants of Kush and that in the twelfth century they had served Raja Jaichand in a military capacity during the period of Muslim consolidation of the Delhi Sultanate. Subsequent persecution by the victorious Muslims caused the Kushwaha kshatryia to disperse and disguise their identity, foregoing the sacred thread and thereby becoming degraded and taking on various localised community names.Gupta's attempt to prove Kshatriya status, in common with similar attempts by others to establish histories of various castes, was spread via the caste associations, which Dipankar Gupta describes as providing a link between the "urban, politically literate elite" and the "less literate villagers". Some communities also constructed temples in support of these claims as, for example, did the Muraos in Ayodhya.

Classification as Backward Caste
Some Kushwaha reformers also argued, in a similar vein to the Kurmi reformer Devi Prasad Sinha Chaudhari, that since Rajputs and Bhumihars and Brahminsworked the fields in some areas, there was no rational basis for assertions that such labour marked a community as being of the Shudra varna.

Kushwahas are classified as a Most Backward Caste (MBC) in some Indian states. In 2013, the Haryana government added the Kushwaha, Koeri and Maurya castes to the list of backward classes. Category:Indian History Category:Kachhwaha Category:Hindu Category:Rajput Category:Kachhi Category:Suryawansh Category:Kushwah Category:Kushwah rajput