User:Lwupharm/Testicular atrophy/ZZhang031 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

group 28


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Testicular atrophy
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Testicular atrophy

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

yes, this group has a well-organized guiding framework. It follows the sequential order from causes, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. The group provides various information on the causes of the condition. Also, signs and symptoms are in chronological order which is easy to follow. However, the lead should include more information about the condition. For example, under the sign and symptoms, they mention this condition may occur before or after adolescence with different signs and symptoms not only decrease the size of the testicle. In the lead, they should provide this information as well to provide a better understanding of this condition.

2. Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

yes, this group has a clear structure, neutral content, and up-to-date secondary sources.

3. Are the claims included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available?

The majority of the sources are verifiable secondary sources, and the articles are up-to-date. However, some unreliable sources are not from textbooks or journal articles such as citations #1, 2, 6, and 10, and there is no author in some of these articles. In the lead and sign and symptoms sections, the statements are attributed to unreliable sources (citations #1 and #2). Citation #14 needs to edit to include the title. Citation#15 is an overview, so this group should point out which article they use.