User:Ly1729560145/Sauropsida/HarappanBoyz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ly1729560145


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ly1729560145/Sauropsida


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sauropsida

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - No. It might be nice to make a quick mention of the fact that Sauropsida brain structure is a studied aspect.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * I s the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - The articles used are on the older side. It might help to have something more recent. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4832283/ This seems promising

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - "So, it is possible that dinosaurs, like T-rex which we know have tiny brain compared to their enormous body size, to be much more intelligent than what people imagined." This sentence seems like it's trying to convince me of the hypothesis being truthful.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes!

Images and Media

 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - Unsure. It might not be entirely safe to add this image.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes, it adds to the importance and scale of study on Sauropsida reflected in the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - It's very descriptive. For what is included, it is concise and well done.
 * How can the content added be improved? - It would help to have more recent articles to expand on the state of study of Sauropsidia.