User:Lydiaesperanza/sandbox

Notes on Community Development page:

- direct quotes have citation directly after

- other words are available as links to see their wikipedia pages

- history can be biased, it's very general and not positive what point of view it comes from unless checking references

- interpretations of different countries

- not as much information provided for global south, so maybe slightly biased for global north

- seems all references work

- mostly neutral

- may be a little out of date, wikipedia notes the article requires cleanup

- community ensures the article isn't biased and aims to providing the facts they can find

.

Comparison to Refugee Women's Network:

- shorter and much less information available

- only a couple general sentences available on the topic itself

- provides history as well

- wikipedia notes the article has multiple issues

- not all references work

- little to no discussion on the talk page

.

Critique Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974:

- only three references, two worked but the last was from the U.S. Census Bureau that said they were performing maintenance on the site, so not positive if it actually works; other two references from U.S. Bureau of Statistics

- all references reliable

- everything is relevant to the topic

- very standard, neutral information, not biased

- nothing on the talk page

.

.

Collective Benefits Article

- A collective benefit often benefits more than one person at the cost of an individual acting to obtain the benefit.

- It is common that an individual may benefit from a collective act without contributing to it.

- Collective benefits can non-competitive and inclusive if the availability of the benefit does not diminish from the use of one actor. An example of this type of collective benefit is social capital.

- However, they can also be exclusive if the benefit is not available to all networks of relation, such as a pure public good.