User:Lydialzy/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Design history

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason I chosen this article to evaluate because I am interested in design. I think to learn design well, I should first understand its history.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

This article has a good lead section, because the article include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead section has talk about what is design history, and what design history will talk about in the following article. But the lead do not include a brief description of the article's major section. And the lead is concise.

Content

The article's content relevant to the topic. The article's content is talking about how design history important on the design area. And how the design school teach student about the design history. And also mentioned what are include on the design history. However, the content in the article I think is not up-to-date.

The article is addressing topics related to historically underrepresented the topics. The article is talking about how design history affect the design education in Britain.

Tone and Balance

The tone use in the article is neutral point of view. And I think the views on the article are described as fairly as possible, because all the view of the article I feel like is according to the history. I think the article was not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position, because this article is about history.

Sources and References

The sources that the article uses are not current. The article sources use in the article were writing on 2005, and is not current. But the sources are thorough, they are reflect the available literature on the topic.

Organization and writing quality

The article is well-written. And it is concise, clear, and easy to read.

The article do not have any grammatical or spelling errors.

The article is well-organized. Is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media

The article does not include any images.

Talk page discussion

The article does not have talk page discussion.

Overall impressions

The article's strengths are the content relevant to the topic, and has a good lead section. The article can add more images to it. And also can use more current sources to improve the content.