User:Lynnpj29/Harold Lasswell/Vsiguenza Peer Review

General info
Lynnpj29
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lynnpj29/Harold Lasswell:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Harold Lasswell:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead was not updated but it is not necessary because the original Wikipedia article clearly and concisely describes Lasswell's career. The lead touches on his professional affiliations and his teaching career. The content added is relevant to the topic because it incorporates his published work on propaganda and wartime communications projects using content analysis as his qualitative method of choice. Although Lasswell's career is rooted in political science, it might be worth investigating if any of his published studies or books spotlight ethnic communities experiences with propaganda during the climax of World War II. The content is neutral and does not bash or enshrine Lasswell's character. The content is well-written, organized and free of errors. It might be helpful as supplementary content to include one or two images of his most popular work and a brief caption about it. The section headings make it easy to digest Laswell's life and accomplishments in a succinct manner. The list of sources do represent unique perspectives of literature on his contributions. The content added has improved the quality of the article because the original article jumbled together all of his career accomplishments, propaganda and content analysis under one "Work" head. The strengths of the content added are the bulleted lists of his published books and articles that are mostly linked to. Another strength is how his inquisitive approach to robots' rights is written as a future implication for readers to consider. The article was a smooth read!