User:Lzheng0701/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Kunihiko Yuyama

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this because it is part of a wiki-project that I'm sort of interested in. My preliminary impression would be that it needs a lot of help to get to a good status.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section is concise, clear and also includes a brief description of the article's major sections. The content is relevant and up to date however, it does seem to be missing some sources/references. The article appears to be neutral. Not all the facts in the article are backed by a reliable secondary source of information, however most of them are. The sources seem thorough and are current. I sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors and there wasn't a way to include marginalized individuals without heavily detracting from the main subject. I don't believe that there are better sources for the ones that they have used. They have a few links that aren't working. The article is well written; concise, clear and easy to read. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. The article is well organized. There are no images included in the article. There is also no talk page discussion. This article needs a lot of work and is clearly still in a stub status without people actively trying to better the article. The article shows all of Kunihiko's works and has links to many of them. It can be improved by fixing some of the links and by including references and sources in the biography section.