User:M3moogle/sandbox

Source number 32 in the climate change page that mentions the university of Denmark doesn't seem to work or leads me to an error. Most of the sources are linked to a scientific journal stating that this is a valid cited paper. Article is unbiased and does not point to any one path and most sources led me to believe that it was a properly cited paper. It was nice for it to mention neutron and proton ratio as well.

Ecology The circles of sustainability approach treats ecology as more than just the environment and focuses on every biome being linked with humans, animals and plants. This statement is not provided with any reference and the article does not support other facts along its page. No Plagiarism was found and the links lead to reliable scientific sources that support what they're meant to.

Climate change on biodiversity The information comes from mostly scientific journals that are peer reviewed and the facts that it states come with good ideas that don't present any bias.