User:M4M3M2M1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Modulor

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this because I am studying in the field of architecture, and in recent times legacies of power are being reconsidered. The 'Modular' by Le Corbusier is a prime example of something that needs to be deconstructed.

Evaluate the article
Lead section

The introduction sentence is concise. The lead could describe subsequent sections in further detail. All information in the lead is present in the article.

Content

The content is relevant to the article, although it is missing a lot of information. It is not up to date, several publications have considered the use of figures such as Modular in eugenic architectural practices. The article should consider further discussion on historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance

Neutrality is a myth - while there appears to be a surface neutrality it is simply repeating the dominant narrative. One sentence is dedicated to the discussion of the misogyny of the Modular, this section should be expanded upon. Discussion on ableism is absent.

Sources and References

Several sections are missing citations. The sources are very limited. They do not represent a diversity of authors.

Organization and writing quality

The article is concise. There are no noted grammatical errors. The subsections should be expanded upon.

Images and Media

The article contains captioned images. They appear to adhere to the copyright regulations as they are 'Public Domain'.

Talk page discussion

There is discussion regarding correcting statements made about the mathematical concepts, a question regarding footnotes, and a source suggestion. The article has a 'C-class' rating, and is of 'High-importance.'

Overall impression

I had much higher expectations for this article. I would say that it is poorly developed and requires a substantial update.