User:M4TT262/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Osteichthyes

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I choose this articulate because I wanted to dive deeper into the actually anatomy of the Osteichthye fish, mainly I want to add more details on the post temporal bone of the pectoral fin to give insight for new readers on how the pectoral girdle is connected to the fish.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) The Lead section is good and all but I do not think that the author keeps it broad enough for readers to understand how vast the Osteichthyes really are. The author also dipped into the evolutionary category as well which is nice because homology and vestigial traits are good to go over to understand the structure of Osteichthyes. The content is up to date but I think it should include a little bit more data and it shouldn't be combined with another article, because this article alone could be expanded on describing the structures of these fish and how they developed into what they are now with all their functions included as well. The tone throughout the paper was amazing and there was no slip ups at all, was very consistent. The author also had a very extensive list of resources that were all reliable which is showing a great job in having a diversity of resources in order to create a viable article. The article itself was pretty easy to read but in the characteristic section definitely needs to be fixed I do not think it is very organized in the sense that the authors I felt like jumped around too much for me. The images and the media are appropriate but I would label the pictures either by figures, or tables with the media that was given out so that it is easier to navigate throughout the article. This article is rated a C-class article but it is found super important for the field of biology and it is said that it would be important if other authors could write into it, but the most recent comment hasn't happened since June 2020 and that was just stating that the picture used was lophiiform, not a stomatiformes. I think the article had a good start but there is nit enough information for this article to be good it is was to board only hitting on certain parts of the Osteichthyes which is frustrating because I believe that it is biased when I keep re-reading the article because if the lack of information and then the amount of information in other category for example the dive right into the integumentary system of the eye and what it makes up and then talks about it for a sentence more before changing it over to something new.