User:MA2024/Uncertainty reduction theory/Hannah.Morey Peer Review

General info
MA2024
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MA2024/Uncertainty reduction theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Uncertainty reduction theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
You've got a lot of good information here, but I think you need to talk with Dr. Borton about how we are supposed to do the project. It seems that you followed the information required for our presentations. If you are going to stick to the draft you have, PLEASE make sure to cite the textbook, as there are no citations from the textbook here. In fact, there are no citations at all, which leads me to believe you are not sure how to cite things through Wikipedia. If you go back through the tutorials, there will be things for you there to remind yourself how to do that.

Remember to keep the content as neutral as possible. You are doing a good job keeping the content neutral, but some of your statements need evidence of being true (citations.) Example: "The Uncertainty Reduction Theory can be applied in any situation because everyday life can demonstrate to full uncertainty, in terms of communication." You NEED a citation after a sentence like that.

Wikipedia articles do not need conclusions added to them, as there will always be more information added to them. Closing off the article with a conclusion almost closes off the article to other people looking to edit the work.

A lot of the work you put into the definition and other sections can be found in the original article. So do some research into how you can bolster those sections up a bit.

I think it would be best to look through the original article and see what you can add to it, because your information is looking good.