User:MB3526886/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
World Health Organization (Female genital mutilation) ￼


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, this article is relevant to the topic. It goes into dept about the in's outs of female genital mutilation Is it written neutrally?
 * Some parts of it are written neutrally and some are not. The section that talks about Key Milestones is not really written neutrally. The reason being is that it talks about the way's that the organization would like to help end this activity.  Does each claim have a citation?
 * No, it does not but at the end there is a reference list of where the information was taken. ￼ Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, because there are multiple cites who lists the same information within text citations. Also, there is a reference list. ￼ Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * It talks about the culture but does not go into depth about the historical aspect or misrepresented populations. ￼ Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation
 * Sources
 * https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation

Option 2

 * Police Brutality Against Blacks in the United States and ensuing protests
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it is relevant to the topic. It talks about all the Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, it is written neutrally. No sides were taken. All facts Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes, all of the claims have in text citations for reference Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes, the citations are reliable  Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No, it does not. It lacks this information. ￼ Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2020.1822251
 * Sources
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2020.1822251
 * https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2020.1822251

Option 3

 * Article title
 * For Unfortunate Truth's About College


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes the article is relevant to the topic Is it written neutrally?
 * No it is not written neutrally some of it takes sides and gives personal viewpoints Does each claim have a citation?
 * No it does not Are the citations reliable?
 * There are no citations listed. So, is this article even worth reading about with no proof? ￼ Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * No it does not Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * No it does not Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Sources
 * https://www.fastweb.com/student-life/articles/four-unfortunate-truths-about-college

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources