User:MBALead/Henry Mintzberg/Lauren2024 Peer Review

General info
MBALead
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MBALead/Henry_Mintzberg?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Henry Mintzberg

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead of the article is good and gives an overview of the person the article is addressing. Because the person is still alive, the information in the lead may need to be investigated to see if it is still accurate. The lead does not have a brief summary of the information in each section so that could be added. Otherwise, the lead for this article is great and not overly detailed.

Content: The content seems to be accurate and up to date. However, you might want to ensure that everything it says the person is doing is still accurate since he is still alive. I did not see a section for awards. If the person in the article has won some awards since the last update, it would be good information to add about him. This article does not deal with an equity gap.

Tone and Balance: The content of the article is neutral, and it seems to be based on the facts of his life. The article is unbiased and does not try to sway the reader into taking a certain position on any topic. The article does not address any sensitive topics.

Sources and References: There is some information in the section for Personal Life that does not have a source or citation. The information there will have to be checked and given a citation. The sources that are listed at the bottom of the article have variety, as they are written by different authors. The sources are current for the information that they are linked to. The links to the sources that I clicked on worked.

Organization: The article is neatly organized and easy to follow. The sections help the flow of the article. I did not notice any spelling or grammatical errors in the article. The content of the article is easy to read and follow.

Images and Media: The image in the article is relevant. I would also consider adding a more professional photo. The professional photo could go next to the career section.

Overall Impressions: I think that the article is good overall. The edits have made the article better for future users. The article could be edited further using my suggestions, but it is still good without implementing them. The existing content may need to be double-checked since the person is still alive, but other than that the article is great.