User:MBisanz/Qs

Admins
Optional questions from MBisanz
 * 4. Over here I have a list of some of the lesser known admin tools. Which, if any are you unfamiliar with on either a technical or policy basis?
 * A.


 * 5. What is your opinion on User recovery?
 * A.


 * 6. You come across a user vandalizing some articles through POV-pushing, 3RR, etc (Not page blanking or the like), you go to block them and see they have the ip-block-exempt flag. Does this impact your decision to block? What if they protest that they're a trusted user who shouldn't be blocked?
 * A.


 * 7. How do you feel about the Admin Coaching program? Would you be willing to coach interested users once you have some experience with the mop?

Crats
Optional questions from MBisanz


 * 4. How would you close these RfA/Bs? Your only options are "Successful" and "Unsuccessful, as even if it goes to a crat chat, you must express an opinion there as the the final determination of the outcome.
 * A.


 * Candidate1 61%:
 * Candidate2 63%:
 * Candidate3 67%:
 * Candidate4 67%:
 * Candidate5 68%:
 * Candidate6 69%:
 * Candidate7 72%:
 * Candidate8 73%:
 * Candidate9 73%
 * Candidate10 74%:
 * Candidate11 75%:
 * Candidate12 75%:
 * Candidate13 76%:
 * Candidate14 79%:


 * RfB1 79%:
 * RfB2 86%:
 * RfB3 88%:

(Note: The above RfA/RfB's are from real cases. While we have made every effort to remove the  dates and names of pertinent parties to protect their privacy, it is entirely possible that we may have missed something.)


 * 5. One of of the crats elected in 2004 has yet to use any of the crat tools and others have used them very rarely. Do you think the crat position should have a minimum level of activity? Would you trust a crat who hasn't looked at RFA in four years to close one?
 * A.


 * 6. Not too long ago the first Bot-RFC was filed. How do you reconcile this process with the WT:BRFA process? How would you as a crat interpret a Bot-RFC in deciding whether or not to involuntarily deflag a bot?
 * A.


 * 7. Currently, no editor has ever passed RfB with a % less than 85%. At the same time, four of the six Arbcommers elected in December 2007 had support %s below 80%.  Do you see any potential role for crats, with their high level of community trust, in the Dispute Resolution processes?  Would you accept or feel it appropriate to ask the crats as a group to assist in DR?
 * A.


 * 8. Of the 3,500+ prior RFAs, only eight have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime; of over 100 prior RFBs, only two have ever had a bureaucrat extend the endtime. Which of the below would you have extended and under what circumstances and by what process would you extend an RFA in general?


 * A.
 * Jayjg by Cecropia:
 * Quadell by Cecropia:
 * ABCD by Raul654:
 * Minghong by Cecropia:
 * Neutrality 3 by Pakaran:
 * Uncle G by Cecropia:
 * Weyes2 by Cecropia:
 * HolyRomanEmperor3 by Linuxbeak:
 * Diez2 by Cecropia:
 * Cla68 by Taxman:
 * Benjah-bmm27 by WJBscribe:


 * Grunt by Cecropia:
 * Ral315 by Raul654:


 * 9. Francs2000, Optim, Eloquence, Danny, Ugen64, and WJBscribe were decratted at their own requests between 2004 and 2008. Of them all, the only controversial decrattings could be considered Ugen64 who resigned after a dispute over the promotion % for RFBs and Francs2000 who resigned after a dispute over tallying RFA results.  Danny's remains the unusual case of him resigning both crat and sysop rights and later being re-RFA'd, all in connection with his ceasing employment at the Wikimedia Foundation.  Which of these users would you re-crat if they asked at WP:BN and which would you require to re-run RfB?


 * A.
 * Francs2000:
 * Optim:
 * Eloquence:
 * Ugen64:
 * Danny:
 * WJBscribe:
 * The Rambling Man:
 * Nichalp: