User:MCaro99/Sleep disorder/MCaro99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

The article itself


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sleep disorder


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sleep disorder

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead includes a great introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. It includes a brief description of the articles major sections. The lead section is concise and does not have any unnecessary information.

Content: All content added is relevant to the topic. The sources used are not all up to date, in fact the oldest articles used are from 1998.

Tone and Balance: All information in the article is neutral. There is no bias shown throughout the article.

Sources and References: The sources reflect what the article says. The links that I did go through work perfectly fine. The sources are not all current, I suggest adding more current sources to make the article more reliable.

Organization: The article is easy to read, it is concise, and clear. It is very well organized and are little to no spelling errors.

Images and Media: The images enhance the understanding of the topic and are well captioned.

My detailed planned changes:

I plan on adding more to the hypnosis section of the article. I think there could be more in depth information. I also plan on looking more into acupuncture and how that could help with sleep disorders. I plan on reading more and researching more on insomnia because I believe that it is more common in sleep disorders.