User:MFol2017/Minority Stress/Sierra.french Peer Review


 * I think the article itself is unbiased, presents multiple view points (with evidence proving or disproving points), and is organized well.
 * The information presented in the sandbox is very interesting and adds further detail to the information already in the article, without being repetitive. New sources are quoted (though they do need to be added in the bibliography and cited fully on the page).
 * Perhaps add what those "different set of stressors" are?
 * Overall very good! Presents valuable information in an unbiased manner with evidence to support.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)