User:MG4cats/Boron neutron capture therapeutics/Lipidmonolayer1 Peer Review

General info
MG4cats
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MG4cats/Boron neutron capture therapeutics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead does a good job of describing the general methodology explored on the page. The final line, "As of 2023, only sodium borocaptate (BSH) and boronophenylalanine (BPA) have been used in patient treatment on a large scale," alludes to the historically minded writing of the rest of the article well.

Many of the sources used for this article are quite old but given the framing of the article, it makes sense. The 2018 Cancer Communications paper does bring promise that the chemistry-focused section will be up-to-date with current research. The articles used are also from reputable journals so they should make for a well-evidenced page.

The tone is matter-of-factly and neutral which is good. The article also recognizes controversies in the field but doesn't pick a side, which is also a great sign. I would really like to see some of coverage of the debates on Hatanaka's work.

The content thus far is well-written and easy to comprehend. There's a few places where there are some comment that interrupt the focus of the sentence (e.g., the borax comment), but overall, good job.

The page would really benefit from having more images, which would likely be paired with the chemistry section. The currently existing image on the draft would be better centered and enlarged. The caption is straightforward and effective. Since this therapeutic technique relies heavily on spatial/tissue localization and precise delivery, it would be more informative to depict it in a biological manner instead of a chemical manner.

Overall, I'm really interested in seeing future updates to this article. The chemistry seems quite interesting from what I've briefly searched.