User:MG4cats/Disulfidobis(tricarbonyliron)/Lipidmonolayer1 Peer Review

General info
MG4cats
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:MG4cats/Disulfidobis(tricarbonyliron)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Review of 3/15/2023 draft

The introduction of the article does a great job of concisely explaining the importance of the compounds in question. I think it can be improved by adding an extra sentence or two also laying out the structure of your article and what the reader can expect to learn from it. Out of curiosity, will any work on [FeFe]-hydrogenase be covered in the article upon completion?

The content seems a bit old, but I don’t have a good sense of how much work has been done on this complex in recent years. The content seems to be very neutral and unbiased. The images added so far are easy to read and understand, which is great.

Some small typos:

there are missing commas in “vibrant red air-stable product”

did you mean to say “In an early work” or “in early works” under Structure and Bonding

Overall, I think the current state of the article provides a good scaffold for your final page. I do wish that the bioinorganic side could be further expanded upon. I think you should include a graphic showing the structure of your compounds, like how most compounds pages on Wikipedia do. I’m also very interested in your section on applications beyond chemical synthesis. Will you do an overlook into the pedagogical uses of the complexes?