User:MLPQG/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Food Angel

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to edit this article because it contains outdated information, is quite brief and underdeveloped. This article covers the food rescue organization Food Angel. The organization has created new divisions and it is important to update the information and complete the article, so it does not lead to confusion about the organization. My preliminary impression was that the page is short and outdated. The article seems unbalanced, meaning that some headings contained in-depth information while others contained superficial information.

Evaluate the article
The article is concise and clearly written. However, the information provided is brief and seems incomplete. The page is underdeveloped.


 * More information can be added to this page by adding information that is posted on their website and by updating the information already written.
 * A bigger variety of sources can be looked into to add relevant and reliable information.
 * The article could also use some visuals, such as the logo of the organization.
 * Information needs to be added about their different services, their efforts in education, their partners, and the impact they have on society. These could be turned into additional sections, except their services which need to be added to the existing section services.
 * The article includes a clear introductory sentence, but the brief description does not include the content of the article's major sections. The lead section is also too detailed.
 * The limited content of the article is relevant to the topic, but not up-to-date. Some services are missing and the main structure of the organization is also not included or explained. The different services that the organization provides are briefly described, however, they could be expanded on.
 * The facts in the article are backed up by secondary sources. There are sources that are no longer available, and the article contains sources such as news papers and websites which seem random.
 * The article is concise and easy to read. It does not contain grammatical or spelling mistakes, and is broken down in logical sections. However, the flow of the writing is less appealing
 * The article is rated as Start-Class and as Low-importance. It is part of the WikiProject Food and Drink, WikiProject Hongkong, and WikiProject Organizations. Maybe by adding it to a different WikiProject related to non-profit organizations the article will remove more attention and might get a better status.