User:MNC-2016/Male prostitution/Tge3hn Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username). MNC-2016


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MNC-2016/Male prostitution


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Male prostitution

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article has okay leads, the draft is very important and could have leads and subheading put throughout the article to touch on the various important mentions( STD, children, negative connotations etc.) The content is very good. The article is very thoughtful and thorough. That being said the sandbox mentions very important concepts that are relatively nuanced and I think need further expanded. I think the article is as unbiased as possible. I think a few more citations/sources could be added. More images would be helpful to understand how male prostitution is understood across cultures. I also think changing the title to male sex work would give it a less negative connotation.