User:MPHILLI/Folk psychology/Kmcmiche Peer Review

General info
MPHILLI
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:MPHILLI/Folk psychology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Folk psychology:

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content has not been updated to the wikipedia page. The content is relevant to the article, and it is up to date. I do not recognize the journal in which the citation (Branden D. Jung Esq., Criminal Law’s Folk Psychological Dilemma: Resolving Neuroscientific and Philosophical Challenges to the Voluntary Act Requirement, 122 W. Va. L. Rev. (2019). is located, and it may need to be reevaluated as a source. I believe another source added after the first sentence may be needed. There are no photos, thus there is nothing to evaluate. More information on relative view and intentional stances is needed. The content appears neutral, with no leaning towards any perspectives. The second sentence may benefit from being broken into two separate sentences. It is a strong start to an addition to the article, but it overall needs more information.