User:MVisic/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Ecomasculinity:
 * This article is extremely short and only briefly mentions the topic of eco-masculinity. It provides a comparison of the topic to the more well-known and discussed term ecofeminism but does not expand any further. There are only three references listed and the most recent is from 2014, which implies there could be additional research that has been recently done on this topic that is not included, therefore the information provided is not up to date. The article also requires additional citations and links to related articles to expand and improve and no longer be classified as a stub.:
 * Sources:

Option 2

 * Brain Gender :
 * This article is based on a book published in 2005, Brain Gender. It provides relevant background information about the author, Melissa Hines, and briefly overviews the topics that are discussed within her book but is not detailed enough or up to date with current information that exists about gender development and the human brain. It can be improved and expanded with additional sources, citations, and related article links that are relevant to the topic and based on current research that has been conducted. :
 * Sources:

Option 3

 * Sarajevo Open Centre:
 * This article discusses the feminist organization and advocacy group for individuals a part of the LGBTI community in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Sarajevo Open Centre (SOC). Other than briefly explaining what the organization is, the article provides almost no information or specific details and is extremely vague. There are only three sections of the article aside from the general description; publications, references, and external links. There are only 4 references listed, two publications, and one external link included in these sections. The article can be significantly improved by providing more specific information from the existing references that are listed to make up for the missing content as well as additional relevant sources and citations with current up-to-date information. The article also seems to include irrelevant information about the Pink Report. There is no explanation as to why this information is included in the article or how it connects to the topic of the Sarajevo Open Centre. Overall the article has several issues that need to be addressed. :
 * Sources: