User:MVisic/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nutrition

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Initially, the article seemed like a well-organized and informative page on the topic of nutrition. It appeared to contain relevant information and current reliable sources of information and citations.

Evaluate the article
The article clearly defines what nutrition is and provides a general overview of the topic in the introductory paragraph. It briefly discusses the background and when the scientific study of nutrition began as well as a detailed explanation of what a nutrient is and its components. The content of the article is mostly relevant to the topic, as it discusses appropriate topics including diet, nutrient cycle, as well as human, animal, and plant nutrition. The article also contains neutral information and does not include any biased viewpoints or claims. The information presented is up to date and was last edited less than two weeks ago. The reference page also contains several reliable and current sources of information including peer-reviewed journal articles. However, there are suggestions for improvement that have been made on the talk page such as changing the definition of nutrition and removing certain irrelevant content or sources to provide a more accurate and precise article. Overall, the nutrition article has been listed as a level 3 vital article in Health and Medicine and has a C-Class rating on the content assessment scale so although there is quality information available, there are still several issues within the article that need to be addressed.